Solutions for Federal AIA Execution
Structured AIA workflows for government institutions and AI vendors operating under the Directive on Automated Decision-Making.
How to reduce your impact level
Already at the lowest impact level.
Top Suggestions
Is this system precedent-setting?
Does the system use protected characteristics as input?
For Federal Institutions
Manage internal AIA workflows with enforced structure, role-based approvals, and submission integrity.
- Privileged Deliberation Space — internal notes technically excluded from official JSON/PDF artifacts
- Draft and review separation enforced
- Required sections validated before export
- Schema version locked per assessment
- Audit log of changes and approvals
Structured Review and Approval
Designed for departments operating under DADM v4.0 compliance requirements.
Draft
Analysts complete the official 106-question schema with conditional logic enforced.
Review
Reviewers assess completeness and mitigation alignment.
Approve and Export
Approved responses generate submission-ready JSON and PDF outputs.
Pre-Submission Validation for Procurement
Reduce structural and scoring risk before contract review.
Impact Classification
See raw impact score and mitigation percentage in real time.
What-If Optimizer
Identify the specific mitigations needed to cross the 80% discount threshold — pinpointing the 2 or 3 questions that drop an assessment from Level III to Level II.
Export Integrity
Generate clean JSON aligned to the official AIA structure.
Impact Level
Mitigation Progress
82%Threshold met (80% required)
A Compliance Execution Layer. Not a Static Form.
Every assessment follows the official AIA v3.0 structure, enforces required sections, and embeds schema version tracking for defensible submission.